In a world where humanity transcends colour, race, or religion, the heart-wrenching genocide in Gaza, perpetrated by Israel, is bound to sadden anyone with even an ounce of humanity. It is in this context that Prince William has raised his voice, advocating for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in the region. This poses a critical question: Will this serve as a wake-up call for Sunak to align with the principles of fair and just humanity, or will he continue to offer unconditional support to the forces perpetuating violence in Gaza and stand by Biden, whose administration has once again vetoed a UN resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire?

The irony does not end here. As Biden positions himself against Putin, advocating for increased sanctions on Russia based on allegations that Putin has orchestrated the death of his opposition. That’s one single person and a claim that remains unproven. But it is unequivocally clear that his veto against the UN’s call for a humanitarian ceasefire directly contributes to the suffering and loss of countless innocent lives.

This raises a pertinent question: Should Biden himself be subject to sanctions? Furthermore, this inquiry extends to the broader Western sphere, prompting us to consider how many among us would concur with such a course of action. This, inevitably, turns the spotlight back onto ourselves.

In navigating these complex geopolitical landscapes, it is imperative to scrutinise the actions and motivations of our leaders. The decision by the UK’s Prime Minister to either challenge or support the current stance of the US administration under Biden will not only reflect the UK’s commitment to global humanitarian principles but also its willingness to confront uncomfortable truths within its alliances. Similarly, the stance of the US, particularly in vetoing calls for a ceasefire, reveals a disconcerting prioritisation of political strategy over human lives.

This scenario underscores a broader dilemma faced by Western democracies: the balancing act between upholding moral imperatives and navigating the intricate web of international relations and alliances. The call for sanctions against Biden, while seemingly radical, highlights the frustration and desperation of those seeking justice and accountability on the global stage.

It’s a humanitarian duty for us to dissect these issues with a critical eye, pushing the conversation beyond mere rhetoric and towards actionable solutions. The involvement of figures such as Prince William in advocating for peace brings a spotlight to these issues, challenging political leaders and citizens alike to reflect on their values and the role they play in the global community.

Ultimately, the resolution of such conflicts and the path towards a more just and humane world order require a collective reevaluation of our priorities, policies, and partnerships. It demands of us, especially those in positions of power and influence, to act not just in the interest of political expediency but in the service of humanity. The decisions made today will not only determine the course of events in regions like Gaza but will also define the moral legacy of our time.